
|
|
Trauma and
Injury in the
Patient with Juvenile
Discogenic Disease
|
|
|
|
|
S.R. was a 37 year old farmer when was driving his pickup
truck, unseatbelted, along a freshly tarred road. His vehicle lost
traction, went off the road, and rolled over multiple times. S.R. was ejected from the
cab and landed on freshly ploughed soil where the pickup then rolled over
him. The pickup and the body impression in the soil (head depression
marked in red) are shown below. S.R.'s MRI showed a pattern classic
for Juvenile Discogenic Disease (JDD). By landing on a soft surface
S.R. was lucky to simply survive this experience. He came out
looking better than his pickup truck. His back problems, after the
accident, were more disabling because he was born with intervertebral discs
which were not as strong as normal discs.
|
|
|
|
|
| S.R. was uniquely fortunate to have survived a traumatic
injury which could very well have been fatal. Generally
speaking those individuals with genomic disorders are
at greater risk for disability or incapacitation than the "normal"
population. If however, those individuals engage in preventive
programs they usually come out ahead of those with normal spines who
are smokers. The challenge clearly
relates to effectively using health care information and preventive
measures to keep one's spine healthy.
An important issue has to do with the basic
concept of "injury" itself. Most episodes which are often
considered "injuries" in the legal context are, in reality, minor
episodes which readily respond to appropriate conservative
(non-surgical) spine care. Legal concepts such as the "Gillette
Injury" or the "Paper-Thin Skull" can easily
cloud the issue of what a "injury" really is. |
|
|
 |
At this time there are no databases upon which
to predict the risk factors in individuals with JDD or genomic
disorders in regard to
potential lifetime disabilitiesy and incapacitation. One important
reason for this is the frequent failure to recognize these
entities. G. K., a 41 year old maintenance worker
injured his back lifting a manhole cover in 1998 and required a
surgical discectomy. In 1999, again while lifting a manhole
cover, he experienced the recurrent free-fragment disc herniation
shown in the image on the left. This patient was never
advised that he had an underlying genomic spine disorder, nor offered a health maintenance program
to avoid future impairment and surgery. |
|
This patient's 1998 his imaging
report noted only a "herniated disc" and nothing more. He was
thereby treated only as a "herniated disc" patient and no time spent in
attempting to educate him as to the reasons as to why the disc herniated in
the first place.
|
|
Prompt MRI evaluation
revealed JDD and a very large non-contained disc herniation at
L4-5 level (red dot). Clearly there had been a chronic
contained disc herniation which then extruded a very large
fragment. With additional disc herniation this patient could
have suffered permanent foot drop or cauda equina compression.
|
| Both cases shown above had good surgical
management but in genomic spine disorders the surgery is the minor event. The major
event is making the right diagnosis to start
with so that the patient can be informed regarding the importance of
continuing preventive care. In this regard not smoking and a daily
self-administered health maintenance program with safe axial spine
distraction/ traction are the key elements to retaining
quality of life and avoiding additional surgery. Patients with
genomic spine disorders can build an important spine reserve by making daily
effort in a spine health maintenance program.
|
|
|

|