|
|
|
Spine Hall Of Fame Biographies |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Harry
Crock |
Harry Crock and his identical brother (the ophthalmologist)
were born and educated in Perth, Australia. Harry Crock had the good fortune, as a
young orthopedic trainee in 1954, to have met, and been influenced by, Joseph Barr (Mixter
WJ, Barr JS: Rupture of the Intervertebral Disc with Involvement of the Spinal Canal, NEJM
211:210, 1934) when he was visiting
Melbourne. He also had the good fortune to have been provided with a discerning
nature which allowed him to appreciate that not all back problems were related to
"herniated discs." This, for its time, represented heretical
thinking. Few heretics end up being appreciated by their peers. Harry Crock is
an exception to this and he was deservedly esteemed to be the leading spine
surgeon in Australia (i.e. Order of Australia in 1984) because of his many contributions.
His interest in anatomical studies, particularly those on the blood supply of the skeleton
and spinal cord, have aided in bringing to the forefront the body anatomy so often ignored
in the past. His anatomic descriptions and technologic advances in instrumentation
and surgical technique have benefited colleagues and patients in many ways. The
gamut of his interests have had wide range and have included important, but obscure,
studies on subjects such as adhesive arachnoiditis ossificans. His publications on
spinal surgery have not just been directed to technique but also on making spine surgery
safer for the patient. Now in private practice in London Dr. Crock would certainly
be an asset to the
National Health Service as a consultant if they should
ever develop a sincere future interest in quality spine care.
|
|
|
|
|
Walter Dandy
|
Walter E. Dandy (1886-1946) was the second Professor of
Neurological Surgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland; Harvey Cushing was
the first. While Harvey Cushing was acclaimed as one of the very first neurosurgeons
in the United States Walter Dandy became the
penultimate neurosurgical technician who took delight in accomplishing the
surgical challenges which Harvey
Cushing said couldn't be done. Walter Dandy was the master at
solving the many challenging, and sometimes lethal,
risks inherent in the new surgical endeavor called "neurosurgery." Walter Dandy's legendary "bloodless" surgical approach to
the posterior fossa of the skull was "bloodless" only if the
operating surgeon knew the
Dandy techniques of pitfall prevention. The Dandy Dogma was simple: "know the
hazards and avoid them." Dr. Dandy's three most important
contributions to the future discipline of spine care were the introduction of ventriculography
and air myelography, the demonstration of the circulation of the cerebro-spinal fluid and
in 1929 he was the first to recognize the true nature of the herniation
of intervertebral
cartilage from an intervertebral disc and its relationship to sciatica and associated
neurologic deficit (Dandy WJ: Loose
Cartilage from Intervertebral Disc Simulating Tumor of the Spinal Cord, Arch Surg,
19:660-672, 1929). His work was
published 5 years before Mixter and Barr first reported on the very same
entity. Because the prevalent thinking at the time
could only relate to tumors (one sees only what one
knows) he was the
very first person to document that this "tumor" was
composed of extruded cartilage. Dandy could not know that "the herniated disc"
would subsequently become an obsessive preoccupation for those who
followed him in treating spine disorders long after he was gone (to the
detriment of identifying other important pathological entities such as
lateral spinal stenosis). Accompanied in the surgical theater by his
personal medical illustrator, Dorcas Hager (Paget), Dandy meticulously
documented a wealth of spinal
surgical pathology as well as his innovative surgical techniques. When he
died, as a result of coronary thrombosis in 1946 his career at Johns Hopkins Hospital had
spanned 30 years. Dandy was clearly the initiator of the flowering
era of spinal care and spinal surgery
in the United States in the 20th century. In his time there were
very few who showed any real interest in this endeavor. The proof of this observation is
that the spine, and its associated structures, continue to be largely ignored on
medical school cadavers as well as on the autopsy tables. Walter Dandy initiated a
new discipline and, in the process, also initiated a progression of spinal diagnostic
procedures which have served as the nidus for a progression of
increasingly sophisticated non-invasive diagnostic tools.
|
|
|
|
Anthony Dwyer
|
Medical practice and the welfare of patients were
blessed when there appeared on the scene someone who asked not
for personal gain and was also willing to serve as a champion and
joust the forces organized for self-serving agendas. Anthony
(Tony) Dwyer is a true modern hero. As the "front man"
for the organization of a
American Board of Spine Surgery he has
"led the charge" against the parochial establishment in an
admirable fashion. Born in Melbourne, Australia of
Irish-Australian parents he competed with 4 siblings and struggled to
obtain a medical education. Good fortune began to smile on him
when, as an intern, at St. Vincent's Hospital, he had the good fortune
to work with Sir
Harry Crock. This
good fortune continued in Oswestry (England) for orthopedic training
at the Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital and then the Orthopaedic
Department at the Queen Mary Hospital (Hong Kong) under the direction
of Prof. A. R. Hodgson. From there to Australia, Boston
(Massachusetts), Australia, Little Rock (Arkansas), New Orleans
(Louisiana), and Denver (Colorado) Tony Dwyer has taken the measure of
his peers and his patients and we have all benefited from this. After
10 years on the faculty of the University of Colorado he has shifted
his expertise to the Spine Service at the Denver Health Medical
Center. Few in the practice of spine surgery have had better
training. Few also, in spine surgery, have had as devoted a wife
as Judy Dwyer who has gone along with all of this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harry
Farfan |
Harry Farfan (1924-1994) was instrumental in bringing
forth the new specialty of spine care and spine surgery. Although he was born in
Trinidad, West Indies of a family of Spanish descent, the majority of his University, medical school and residency
training were in Montreal where he spent most of his professional life.
After obtaining his degrees in biochemistry and medicine at McGill
University he spent three formative years in England tutoring under Norman
Capener, Dennis Dunn and Sir Osmond Clarke. When he completed his orthopedic training, a common teaching was to avoid treating back problems
because "no one ever got better." Today the greatest number of fellowships
in Orthopedics and in Neurosurgery are in spine. This dramatic turn-around in
attitude has reflected the great strides in diagnosis and treatment which have occurred
over a relatively short period of time. Harry Farfan was one of
the important pioneers in effecting this perceptual change. His
clinical observations
and laboratory studies on the role of
spinal mechanics and the effect of accumulated "insult and injury" on
spines
attempting to successfully ambulate on a high gravity planet served to promote interest and
inquiry by others. The Farfan publications on rotational and compressional forces and the
three-joint complex were important catalysts in initiating the present understanding of
these subjects. Harry Farfan was also instrumental in influencing his colleagues
in joining
together to combine their talents for the purpose of advancing the then emerging specialty of spine care. He
was the
founder of the International Society for Study of the Lumbar Spine and was a key
force behind the merging of the North American Lumbar Spine Association (NALSA) and the
American College of Spine Surgeons (COLS) to
form the North American Spine Society in
Laguna Niguel, California on July 24, 1985. Harry Farfan served as the moderator of
this conference and through his leadership talents was able to bring the different physician
specialists together in a harmonious joint endeavor . This effort was instrumental
in allowing spine care, the "dog" of the past, to begin to assume its present
role as the "darling" of orthopedics and neurosurgery today.
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
William Glenn |
It's hard to believe that Bill Glenn trained at Johns Hopkins,
Washington University and Harvard. As a brilliant radiologic
"techno weenie" one would think it more natural for him to have trained
at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Spine imaging was in
a sad state of affairs when Bill Glenn appeared on the scene.
Oil, and then, water soluble
myelography was the "gold standard" at that time. As the father of
multi-planer computerized spine imaging he was rightfully proud of his
handiwork. Then came the Annual Meeting of the American
Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons in Atlanta in 1984. This
Editor remembers well Glenn's fascinating presentation at the meeting
and the following discussion at which a well known Swedish spine
specialist told Glenn that his contribution added nothing to spine
diagnosis and that it was unlikely that CT "would ever have any useful
role in the diagnosis of spine disorders in the future." The same
spine specialist subsequently supported myelography over CT in the
diagnosis of lateral spinal stenosis. Time has proven Glenn to
have been right on all counts. He has been called only a "private
practice radiologist from California." A Burton Report "hat's off"
to this brand of private practice.
|
 |
|
 |
|
Kenneth Heithoff |
Ken Heithoff was not the developer of spine imaging nor the inventor of
the MRI. He was, however, a real pioneer in identifying what this
imaging actually demonstrated so that those who have dedicated themselves to
studying the pathophysiology of the spine (such as
William Kirkaldy-Willis; shown
with Heithoff above) and those attempting to make specific diagnoses in
order to treat patients intelligently could have objective information
upon to base their decisions. Even today there are only a handful
of radiologists well versed in reading spine imaging. This
situation is particularly unfortunate in the failure to diagnose
underlying
genomic spine
disorders. Heithoff was the first to publish a clinical study
on
Juvenile Discogenic
Disease. His continuing efforts to clarify this condition have
extended to genetic investigations. In the old west it was the
pioneers who received most of the arrows. When Heithoff first
began to report entities other than herniated discs and
spondylolisthesis he was accused of "playing into the surgeon's hands"
to justify more spine surgery. To his great credit he has
persisted despite these obstacles placed in his path.
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fred Kahn |
|
As the practice of the healing arts has advanced over the ages it has
not been unusual to observe the phenomenon of truly important and
innovative advances being dismissed, out of hand, by the medical
community. Such was the fate of Philip Semmelweis whose observation
that the washing of hands was an important preventive measure in
avoiding maternal death from puerperal fever. This was something which
was never acknowledged or practiced during his lifetime. Fortunately,
Fred Kahn, M.D. may yet achieve the recognition he deserves from the
medical community while he is still around to acknowledge this. Safe
and effective medical devices and associated therapies are sometimes
lost in the shuffle when compared to the mass marketing of pharmaceuticals
and surgery. Dr. Kahn’s medical career began as a graduate of the
Faculty of Medicine at the University of Toronto and led to the practice
of cardiovascular surgery in the United States following which Dr. Kahn
focused his interest and energy in the healing potential of Low
Intensity Laser Therapy. Starting in 1988 he has pioneered the
development and clinical application of cold laser therapy. Dr. Kahn’s
inventions and his treatment protocols have continually demonstrated a
high level of safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness in treating pain
as well as in wound healing. Remarkably, Dr. Kahn’s effort has received
little in the way of acknowledgement except from his patients; many of
who have suffered from disabling back pain. It is therefore a privilege
for Burton Report to add Dr. Fred Kahn’s name to its Spine Hall of Fame.
|
 |
|
 |
|
Elizabeth Kenny |
Elizabeth Kenny (1880-1952) began her career as a
voluntary aide. She was a self-taught bush nurse in Toowoomba, Australia
and enrolled in the Australia Nursing Service, as a staff nurse, in
1910. Her promotion to the rank of lieutenant reflected her
industry and efforts on behalf of her patients. The honored
title of "Sister" probably reflected her status as a head
nurse. Her
theories regarding the treatment of children afflicted with polio were brilliant
for their time and diametrically
different from those of mainstream medicine. For this she was vilified and continually
attacked as being a fraud by the medical establishment. Her therapies
designed to rehabilitate impaired muscles and to retrain
the nervous system were, however, based on careful observation, deduction, and a
willingness to listen to her patients. It took great spirit for Sister Kenny to
maintain her
integrity while under
constant attack by the establishment. In 1938 at the behest of
Australian physicians a Royal Commission condemned her work as being
"unorthodox" and her procedures "dangerous, damaging,
costly and cruel." It was in Minneapolis where she finally
found a group of sympathetic physicians whose minds were open enough to give her theories a chance.
With their assistance, and that of the city of Minneapolis, a Rehabilitation
Institute (which still bears her name) was founded in 1942. A most important result of
Sister Kenny's work was her influence on others to establish the basic concepts of spine
rehabilitation and allow it to spread throughout the world. Perhaps the most
remarkable event of this saga was that many years after her death, the American medical
establishment finally acknowledged that she was right and that they were wrong. It
is interesting to note that Sister Elizabeth Kenny was never selected to be the
"poster girl" for the feminist movement. She should have been. Although
John Wayne played the role in the movies Sister Kenny practiced "true grit" in real
life.
|
 |
 |
|
William Kirkaldy-Willis |
William Kirkaldy-Willis (Feb. 26, 1914-May 7, 2006) was
someone uniquely gifted as a human being, physician, teacher, and
scientist to bring
logic and understanding to the Tower of Babel called spine care and spine surgery.
A product of the English school system and Cambridge for college
and medical school, K-W was blessed with a disarming charm. His
apparently self-effacing demeanor concealed an incisive wit and a
lifetime search, akin to Diogenes, to identify those with, and
without, integrity in their medical practices. K-W was clearly one
of the true giants in medicine as well as spine care. His
philosophies and his many brilliant medical contributions have
clearly not yet been well appreciated by the medical community (much
akin to the medical profession's failure to appreciate the advice of
Phillip Semmelweis).
His life's work will however serve as his legacy. K-Ws many
interests, skills and humanitarian concerns have, however, been more
readily apparent to all. K-W was a luminary among other luminaries who
were his close associates ( i.e. Leon Wiltse, Harry Farfan and Harry Crock).
K-W also allied himself with the full spectrum of health
professionals involved in the spine care whether they be M.D.s, D.O.s, PhDs, Physical
Therapists, Chiropractors, Exercise Therapists, Trainers or School Teachers.
K-Ws lifetime interest in spine
resulted from his frustrations in attempting to do more for his
patients disabled from spinal tuberculosis during his years as a medical missionary in Mombasa, Kenya in the 1940s. In 1965
he began his 23 year association with the Department of Orthopedics at the
University Hospital in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. During this period of time his
insight into spinal disease and his unique ability to understand and advance the work of
others led to his proposing a unified theory of spinal pathophysiology for which he coined
the term "The Degenerative Cascade." This landmark work which has been
well described in his numerous publications including the four volumes of his
textbook "Managing Low Back Pain"
(Churchill Livingstone, Publishers). It continues to serve as an
important roadmap for those with a interest in traveling the "spinal
highway."
Few diamonds have exceeded, in the number of their surfaces the many facets
of talent possessed by Dr. K-W. On the medical side these have included non-invasive treatments
as well as surgery and the importance of back education, exercise,
prevention and health
maintenance programs. His vision and persistence were key in
bringing organization to the spine establishment as a primary
founder
of the
North American Spine Society. Less well known have been his accomplishments in art, botany,
missionary work, philosophy and other humanitarian endeavors. His wife,
Betty
Kirkaldy-Willis, has been another North American spine pioneer in
her initiation of the
concept of "Low Back Schools" and advocating the importance of low back
education starting early in life. As a leader in the spine community Dr. K-W has
worked for balance while supporting the philosophy that the patient's welfare
should be the paramount
concern for the clinician.
|
|
|
|
Leonard Malis
|
Leonard Malis was born in Philadelphia in
1919. Following his neurosurgical residency he was a Dazian
Fellow in neurophysiology at Yale under John Fulton. It was
during this period of time that he introduced the first true bipolar
coagulator which was introduced into clinical use in 1953. As a member
of the faculty of the Mount Sinai School of Medicine he was elevated
to Chairman of the Department of Neurosurgery in 1970. His
interest in microsurgery began in 1965 and by 1967 he had limited his
practice to microsurgical procedures. A
dry operative
field for spine surgery was something unknown until the advent
of improved patient positioning in the 1920s and hemorrhage
control by cautery in 1926. It was Malis, in 1955, who first
developed a true bipolar coagulating forcep. This was marketed
to the profession in 1966. The introduction of bipolar coagulation was
a important step in allowing spine surgeons to also become
"microsurgeons." In addition to his pioneering of
safer, and more effective microsurgical cautery Malis continued,
throughout his professional career (he retired from practice in 1994),
to contribute in many areas including
prophylactic
antibiotics and surgical instrumentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Frank
Mayfield
|
Frank Mayfield (1897-1991)was selected as the first
recipient of the Harvey Cushing Medal of the American Association of
Neurological Surgeons in 1977. This was only one reflection of
the many contributions he made to the neurosurgical profession during
his career. He founded the Mayfield Institute in Cincinnati
where much of his legacy is continued. Among his many
contributions there have been some which were particularly significant
to the field of spine care and are recognized here. Mayfield, in
1980, documented his 16 years of clinical experience with
fat grafts
and noted that they could prevent epidural and per neural scar tissue
and control cerebro-spinal fluid leaks and in the repair of dural
tears. He also noted that their greatest danger was the
possibility neural compression. The illustration above is from
his chapter in Clinical Neurosurgery (1980) "Autologous Fat
Transplants for the Protection and Repair of the Spinal
Dura." It demonstrates autologous fat being sutured to the
dura to close a complicated defect. His interest in the
subject of
adhesive
arachnoiditis was an avant-garde effort for its time. He not
only was interested in the clinical picture but worked with associates
to better understand the nature of the cellular reactions
involved. In 1983 he, and his associates, were the first to
culture arachnoid cells to demonstrate their growth characteristics,
morphology and cytoskeletal structure. By electron microscopy
and immunofluorescence it was shown that the cell cultures derived
from the arachnoid membrane were arachnoid cells alone and not
fibroblasts (characteristic of the dura mater). This work made
clear that in arachnoiditis the fibrosis results from the migration of
fibroblasts from the adjacent dural membranes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles Ray |
Although he was the recipient of the Industrial R&D Gold Prize for the
invention of the prosthetic disc nucleus in the year 2000 the Burton
Report believes that his development of the Ray titanium threaded
cage has been his single greatest
contribution to the care of spine patients to-date. Blessed with
an inquiring mind and the ability to speak fluently in eight languages
Charles D. Ray has traveled the globe as a savant versed in medicine,
engineering, philosophy and just about everything else. In one of
his over 350 publications he pointed out to his neurosurgical colleagues
that although they obtained the majority of their income from spine
surgery this subject occupied less than 5% of their educational
endeavors. As a president of the North American Spine Society, the
American College of Spine Surgeons and the Spine Arthroplasty Society he
has endeavored to point out that the human spine is inherently flexible
and that better surgical alternatives than rigid fusion exist for the
patient. As the founder of CeDaR Surgical and Raymedica he has
been one of only a few clinicians who have had the knowledge and skill
to actually design and manufacture innovative medical devices. By
advocating "arthrodesis" and "arthroplasty" rather than "fusion" he has
forced other clinical minds, locked into obsolete thinking, to gaze at
new horizons.
|
|
|
|
Charles Rosen |
If Diogenes of Sinope were sill engaged in his worldly quest to find an
honest man he would doubtlessly have a broad smile on his face when he
encountered Charles Rosen. Dr Rosen's efforts to re-establish
integrity in spinal care and a habit for "telling it like it is"
have not always endeared him to every spine surgeon. As the
founder, and President, of the Association for Ethics in Spine Surgery
he has, however, given heart to the majority of his colleagues who still
place their patient's best interests ahead of their own. As a
Clinical Professor of Orthopaedics at the University of California in
Irvine Dr. Rosen has been in the right place for the right reasons.
Unfortunately, the health care community just seems to be now coming out
of a pervasive period when many in the medical profession have forgotten
the basic concepts upon which the practice of medicine was based and
need to be reminded of this. Hopefully, there are, and will
continue to be many more Charles Rosens in our future to continue to
remind us.
|
|
|
|
David
Selby |
David Selby (1935-1997) was sometimes wrong but never in
doubt. No one ever questioned where David Selby stood on an issue because he was never
loath to present his viewpoint. Born in Illinois he practiced in Dallas, Texas where he
surrounded himself with talented associates. His background as a paratroop combat surgeon
served him well in his, sometimes irreverent, commentaries
reflecting the trials and tribulations of
medical politics. No one ever doubted that if the "chips were really down" and
you found yourself in a foxhole it would be a real comfort to have David Selby at your
side. Irreverence, in his hands, was a sometimes-beautiful thing.
He was one of the few
who was willing to say the things which needed to be said to those, who who were pompous
and intimidating, and otherwise unchallenged. He could defuse (as well as fuse) a discussion with a well-placed
comment. David Selby possessed a unique ability and strength to be able to pick up,
and continue to run with, batons dropped by others. When the attempts to establish a North
American Spine organization faltered David Selby was there to
pump new life into the
effort. He had the gift of not always taking himself seriously and, because of this, he
was often able to communicate better than most with his patients. He was not only a
skilled surgeon but also a skilled artisan and sculptor. He gave much more to his
peers than most of them have realized.
|
|
|
|
C.
Norman Shealy |
Clearly, C. Norman Shealy, has stood out among his peers as a
brilliant maverick. Few careers in medicine have spanned a
greater gamut of interests or important innovations. After
graduating Duke medical school Shealy completed his neurosurgical
training at Massachusetts General Hospital. His devoted
interest to comprehensive patient care has been unique. His
interest in neurostimulation began with his family's use of the "Electreat"
transcutaneous electrical neurostimulator (TENS). He was
among the first to encourage the development of solid-state TENS
devices and was the first to clinically employ implanted
dorsal cord neurostimulators
for pain relief. Along the way he recognized the value of
facet denervation as an important adjunct in the treatment of low
back pain and pioneered the development of controlled
percutaneous radio-frequency facet
denervation. His devotion to non-narcotic pain management
has had a major productive influence on American medicine. His
other important contributions have included the importance of
axial spine traction,
biogenics, and alternative medicine. His excursions into the
field of parapsychology have been more controversial.
Irrespective of the subject his viewpoints have always been worthy
of our sincere attention.
|
|
|
|
James
Simmons, Jr.
|
Hidden behind a self-effacing demeanor reside the
remarkable talents of one of the prime movers of spine care during the
latter third of the 20th century in the United States. As the
originator of "The
Challenge Of The Lumbar Spine" series, which served as the
impetus to the creation of other organizations to follow, James
Simmons (known universally as "Walt") was the creator of a
series of conferences, held throughout the United States on a yearly
basis. Each conference was designed to provide a comprehensive
understanding of the existing multi-disciplinary evaluation methods,
diagnostic techniques, management and surgical innovations for the
experienced individual treating or working with patients with back
problems. Because each conference had a different chairman and
faculty the approach was always unique and stimulating. In
addition to the Challenge, however, Walt Simmons has often been the
catalyst by which things happened in the spine care specialty.
As Vice-Chair of the American College of Spine Surgeons he has
continued in the attempt to educate his colleagues in initiating
updated "Challenge of the Spine" review courses. Dr.
Simmons has been able to stay out of the spotlight.....until now.
|
 |
 |
|
Wesley Parke |
As a Professor of Anatomy at the University of South
Dakota School of Medicine, Wesley Parke resided in a academic
ivory tower. Fortunately for those in spine care he has, on occasion, sallied forth
to challenge the clinicians with new thoughts based on his extensive scientific research
on the vascularity of the spinal cord and nerves. His
ability to translate these findings into reality for the physician and the patient have
been most important. He has shown that when spinal nerve compression occurs that it
is the impairment of the less resilient venous return system that produces the clinical
symptoms. This means that surgeons can not merely "unroof" nerves in
treating
lateral spinal stenosis but must also relieve tension and stretch on the
structure to allow return to a normal state. His work on the micro-anatomy of the pia-arachnoid has shown that the "percolation" of spinal fluid through this
membrane accounts for 50% of spinal nerve nutrition. These data have served as a
means of understanding the effect of arachnoiditis on spinal nerves and how the
deprivation of nutrient can contribute to a hyperexcitable nociceptive state.
Wesley Parke has been one of the few academicians who has been capable of translating
science directly into a meaningful reality for all of those in the spine care
community.
|
|
|
|
Sarah (Andreae-Jones) Smith |
Dr. Smith has been a medical icon in her devotion to patients
suffering from the devastating disabilities associated with clinically
significant adhesive arachnoiditis and other chronic pain syndromes.
She has also been one of the very few physicians who have devoted their
professional time to this challenging group of patients for which there
have been no easy answers. Dr. Smith became a patron of the
United Kingdom charity, the Arachnoiditis Trust in 1998 and has
continued to tirelessly work with patient groups around the globe.
She has published numerous articles on Arachnoiditis including a
handbook on the subject for primary care physicians. As a
specialist in chronic pain management Dr. Smith has endeavored to
"listen" and assist these patients. The book "Is Anyone Listening"
published by Dr. M. G. Anderson (The Copy Press, New
Zealand, 2005) provides a unique insight into Dr. Smith, her
work, and a population of patients who feel that "no one" is listening
or interested in managing their legitimate medical problems.
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
Isadore Tarlov |
Isadore M. Tarlov (1905-1970) was a neurosurgeon who
never forgot he was also a physician. Born in Norwalk, Connecticut he attended Clark
University in Massachusetts. As an avid pupil of Robert Goddard, the inventor of the
rocket, he became inspired by science. After graduating from Johns Hopkins Medical
School in 1930 he was the first neurosurgical resident of Wilder Penfield at the newly
founded Montreal Neurological Institute. These experiences led him to understand
what was really important in caring for the sick and did his best to communicate his
philosophy to his students, as well as his colleagues. In his 1969 text, "The
Principle of
Parsimony in Medicine" he presented his insightful approach to the
practice of medicine based on Oslerian concepts (re: William Osler, Professor of Medicine,
Johns Hopkins Hospital). Tarlovs studies on the anatomy and pathology of
the spinal nerves, the arachnoid space, and his description of
sacral nerve root cysts (which
continue to bear his name) all contributed to making the study of the spine a worthy
endeavor. Dr. Tarlov's introduction of fibrin glue has continued to be a valuable
contribution to spine surgery.
|
|
Another most important contribution
was to provide spine surgeons with the means by which they could operate in a
"dry operative field" and thus be able to demonstrate their technical
gifts. This was the creation of the knee-chest position,
in conjunction with William Cone in Montreal.
|
|
| This innovative positioning (still
in use today) decreased abdominal compression and thus also decreased operative blood
loss. Isadore Tarlov's greatest legacy to his patients was, however, his example of
maintaining that the patient's interests always came first and this was always accompanied
by compassion; as well as respect.
|
|
 |
 |
|
Henk Verbiest |
Henk Verbiest (1909-1997). It took over 50 years after
Gregor Mendel's
demise for trailblazing studies on plants to be "discovered"
and serve as the basis for the
field of genetics (now known as Mendelian genetics). Henk Verbiest's identification of
lateral spinal stenosis of the lumbar nerve canal was one
of the most important single contributions to the field of spine care.
Born in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, he started his neurosurgical
career at the City and University Hospital in Utrecht in 1942 where he
rose to the rank of Professor of Neurosurgery in 1963. Noted for his
"impressive capacity for work" Henk Verbiest could usually
be found in the operating room during the day and working on his
research studies and the Journal Neuro-Orthopedics at night. His
first description of lateral spinal stenosis was in 1940 as a
contribution to a Festschrift honoring the retirement of his teacher
Clovis Vincent. This, and subsequent publications, on lateral spinal
stenosis led to this entity being referred to as "the Verbiest
Syndrome" by many of his colleagues. It has now been over 50
years since Henk Verbiest first published on lateral spinal stenosis.
In 1981 failure to adequately diagnose or treat lateral spinal stenosis was identified as the
single most common
reason for patients to not do well after back surgery (the "failed back
surgery syndrome"). As we enter the 21st century lateral
spinal stenosis still remains the most common reason for patients to
have a poor surgical result. It is clear that despite the passage of
time, many of Henk Verbiest's spine surgery colleagues still do not
have a clue regarding this important pathologic entity. The good
news is that Verbiest's fame will only increase with the passage of time as
more individuals recognize his historic work and insights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leon
Wiltse
|
Leon Wiltse (1913-2005). It is not uncommon in
medicine to encounter academicians
demonstrating poor clinical or surgical skills. It is also not
uncommon in medicine for technically gifted
surgeons to be poor teachers. Lee Wiltse
demonstrated that these endowments are not necessarily exclusive and
can all be present in a single individual. It may very well have been that Wiltse's upbringing
in North Dakota and education at Northwestern University were partially responsible for
these many talents. In addition to the Wiltse also demonstrated that it is
also possible to be fair and open-minded regarding one's own technical
innovations as well as those of others. Due to this, his modesty, and his
complete integrity, Lee Wiltse gained an exceptional level of credibility among, and
appreciation by, his peers. These attributes served him
well as a
natural leader in the
field of
spine care. His
teaching influence, research and technical advances established an enviable legacy of
excellence. It is only a rare surgeon who has also been a savant, philosopher and
historian. Leon Wiltse's inquiring mind led him to explore many important,
sometimes unpopular, issues ignored by others. His special interest in
spondylolisthesis and studies and publications on the subject of adhesive arachnoiditis
due to the neurotoxicity of oil myelography have greatly aided our understanding of why so
many surgical patients in the past have ended up as "failed back surgery"
syndromes. Because of his work others have been encouraged to develop better
diagnostic and therapeutic alternatives for patients thus sparing many from being
afflicted with a life of intractable pain and associated disability. When others, after rushing to
embrace chemonucleolysis with chymopapain, just as suddenly turned their back on it Lee
Wiltse showed how its value could be maintained by more sensible
application. As a
technically gifted orthopedic surgeon Lee Wiltse was able to appreciate the shortcomings
of existing pedicle screw instrumentation systems and to design better implants. He
was also able to demonstrate that surgical device manufacturers could deliver
a higher
quality and also run an ethical business. Few have done more, behind,
as well as on, the scene, to show the way for decency in their profession than Lee Wiltse.
His departure from the scene has created a void which is unlikely to be
filled in the future.
|
|