
|
|
The Infamous
"Transitional Syndrome" |
|
|
"The
Transitional Syndrome"
is also known as
"Adjacent Segment Disease")
|
|
|
 |
The continuing dilemma in spine care is that multi-level rigid spine fixation
typically creates adjacent stress-related pathology of adjacent
spinal segments as well as stress-related problems directed to the
pelvis; often
related to the sacro-iliac joint. These
are commonly referred to as "transitional syndromes."
These problems are not infrequently create more patient
disability than the problem for which the fusion
was initially performed to address. Often the treatment of
transitional syndromes require additional surgery.
In the
example shown at the left a "rigid" front and back five level (L2 to the sacrum)
instrumented fusion has been performed. |
|
This extensive surgery involved both
anterior (in this case using femoral ring allografts) as well as posterior
surgical approaches with placement of segmental pedicle screws and rods. Autogenous bone
was then harvested from the patient's pelvic crest (ileum) and placed
dorso-laterally.
The yellow dots are placed on the
thickened and sclerotic end plates of the degenerated segment above this rigid
stabilization.
Because of the stress generated from the rigid instrumentation the L2-3 disc interspace has collapsed. This
represents a typical example of the
"transitional syndrome." In this case the patient's
complaints were those of only back pain. The transitional syndrome can also
produce leg and sacral nerve root problems due secondary to disc herniation as well as
stenosis (central, spinal recess and lateral spinal). When a transitional
syndrome causes neurologic impairment this may necessitate additional surgery and additional surgical
stabilization.
|
 |
Failure of a surgeon to explain to a patient the
possibility of a their developing a transitional syndrome means that the
surgeon has not provided the patient with adequate
informed consent. Mother Nature has been kind enough to
demonstrate this phenomenon as shown on the left. This is an example of a
congenital block vertebrae in a young adult. Because the
spine did not normally segment during fetal development (see green dot) inordinate stress has been
placed on the adjacent intervertebral discs producing not only
degeneration (see red dots) but has also created a discogenic pain syndrome.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
This is an example of a post-surgical
transitional syndrome following a rigid multi-level fusion
involving the L3. L4 and L5 vertebrae. It can be noted on
the far left that this patient has an underlying
genomic spine
disorder. At the transitional level (L1-2) significant
segmental dysfunction has developed with reactive changes.
Note also the development of
lateral spinal stenosis at this segment. |
|
 |
Stress Fractures
The drawing to the left illustrates a case provided by Elmer
Nix where the force exerted by the
pedicle screws was sufficient to actually fracture the sacrum itself in a elderly
patient with osteoporosis. |
|
Sacral and pelvic fractures are uncommon complications of rigid
instrumented fusion but this occurrence helps to provide
important evidence regarding the high degree of
non-physiologic stress
and loading which is directed by rigid fusions upon adjacent body
structures.
There can be no question but that rigid instrumented
spine fusions can be, for the right patient,
a truly beneficial
endeavor. The patients least well served are those who
have multi-level degenerative disc problems to start with. This is
particularly true when "back pain", as opposed to progressive
neurologic impairment, is the reason for such surgery. Adjacent segment
degeneration studied on 217 consecutive fusion patients in 2001 showed that
after an average of only 5 years 10% of patients had developed
transitional changes requiring re-operation (Ghiselli
et al, NASS, Seattle, November 1, 2001). |
 |
In this classic example of example of
the "transitional syndrome" it resulted from
inappropriate
surgery to start with.
The patient,
a 64 year old retired window was talked into a five level front and
back fusion as primary treatment for her low back pain.
Back pain relief lasted for only 9 months before more disabling pain
occurred. Two years after surgery this patient had
developed a prominent transitional syndrome above the fusion
associated with a developing retrolisthesis. An
aberrant pedicle
screw also present. |
|
|
Rigid multi-level instrumented spine stabilization is inherently a non-physiological procedure. It
is now clear from American Medical Association terminology that the term "fusion"
is now obsolete having been
replaced by the term "Arthrodesis." In 1987
and in
1990 the Editor first introduced the concept of "flexible
stabilization" and "non-metallic flexible stabilization systems" in spinal
devices as means of extending the vistas of the spine surgeon (Burton
CV: The Liabilities of Fusion. In Cauthen JC (editor) Lumbar Spine
Surgery. Baltimore:Williams and Wilkins, 1987; Burton CV: Fusion: Where
It's Been and Where It's Going. In Weinstein JN, Weisel SW (editors) The
Lumbar Spine. Vol. 2. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1990).
In 1994 Henri Graff , of Lyon, France, pointed out that: "a
fused" spine is not a normal state and
introduced a spine stabilization system designed to provide better
load-bearing. The Editor's studies on flexible
stabilization systems continue to show that the human body is a
basically hostile environment for even biocompatible materials.
Scientific studies continue to support the observation that flexible
implants significantly reduce motion at adjacent segments. With the
establishment of the paradigm of the importance of flexible stabilization attention has
also turned toward the better use of the patient's own "biomaterials"
for which the results are more rewarding and the price "is right."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|